As financial professionals we have all had to cut expenses. Clearly the largest targets of reduction are the largest expenses - people and
If you had this situation, were there any unintended/unexpected outcomes?
As financial professionals we have all had to cut expenses. Clearly the largest targets of reduction are the largest expenses - people and
If you had this situation, were there any unintended/unexpected outcomes?
For professionally pointed employees (i'm speaking of internal office spots and not general labor or call center staff), try FLSA overtime.This changes everyone from an hourly rate to a salary. Overtime is calculated at a modified rate. A staffer will know that their base salary is $XX annually. The calculation of overtime is based upon the weekly salary divided by the number of hours worked for that week. Overtime is earned at 50% of the current week's hourly rate. Someone can earn overtime, but it becomes less profitable the more hours they work.
Take a salary of $400 per week ($20,800 annualy; simplified for math purposes), their hourly rate would be $10 for a normal 40 hour work week. When they work 45 hours, their hourly rate becomes $8.88, and overtime pay is $4.44 for the five hours - $22.20. If they were paid at straight overtime ($10/
In my view, this manages two ends of the spectrum. Staff do get paid overtime when qualified for it, but since it isn't such a guaranteed money maker for them, they tend to be more strategic in getting their work done within regular hours. This also prepares them to advance to a true salary position that won't get OT. From the employer perspective, atual OT costs decrease dramatically even if the total hours worked does not change.
I found that this also helped me draw better entry level applicants when I could advertise a salaried position (and let them know they could still get OT), instead of hourly.
I have simplified the answer and examples. There are more rules published by the DOL which outline the way this is done (and you can create a weeky salary that is based on more hours than 40 per week, if that is what is normal in your industry).
Sara - thanks. Very interesting. Can you refer me to a link where I can review this approach in more detail?
In running a large customer service organization, I had all staff write time, placing each task in a particular bucket. What we found was that certain problem resolution tasks took the most time. Then we went to market for technology that allowed categorization. This analysis allowed us to route the more complex calls to special staff, who could handle these during normal hours. The regular--have you received my payment calls, for example--could be handled by the rest of staff.
Sara's approach is interesting. We looked into a salaried approach, but our HR organization would not approve that for AR/customer service staff.