My husbands company switched from vacation time/sick time to PTO. He was given a total of 4 weeks of PTO. However, when he was hired (and it is in writing) he was promised 4 weeks vacation time plus sick time. Does he have a legitimate right to have increased PTO days to compensate for the guaranteed 4 weeks vacation that was written in his offer letter? Thanks!
Company switched to PTO and took away amount of vacation time that was given at hire.
Answers
I can't respond to the specifics (different states have different requirements), but policies change at companies over time for various reasons. If your husband is a relatively new hire,
I have a limited amount of vacation/PTO time at my company, however my efforts are rewarded with occasional flexibility. This is flexibility that cannot be abused, but no one takes me to task when I need to extend my lunch and still leave on time one day. Communication and accomplishment drive the rewards I get where I am at.
This forum isn't for providing legal advice. Please contact a competent attorney who specializes in labor/employment law.
Actually he is a 15 year employee who does 90% travel. He is rarely home and that has been the way since he was hired. Not looking for legal advice, just looking for what the norm in the workplace is. Twenty PTO days for 15 years of dedicated service does not seem equitable.
Thanks!
I can't give legal advice. From HR perspective, I don't see anything wrong, as long as the company didn't take anything from the already accrued vacation balance. Unlike vacation time, accrued sick time doesn't have to be paid out. PTO can be used as vacation and sick time, but cannot be lost once accrued. Under the new policy of your husband's company, PTO time equals the previous policy for vacation time. On top of it, companies always retain the right to review and change their policies.