Going Concern language

A buddy is CFO for a startup and the auditor has provided going concern language that includes the term "substantive doubt' about its ability to continue as a going concern. I understand that this is standard, especially when they're losing money and relying on VC funds to operate. But is there any wiggle room to possibly modify the verbiage? I look forward to your responses.

Answers

EMERSON GALFO CFO • September 7, 2016

Does it matter? Unless the startup got funding (or should I say, runway) for 2 or more years, it will be standard verbiage. It is one of the "pains" a startup (with audited financials) has to endure until the business model (revenue) firms up. Just make sure that the auditor qualifies (or includes) the reason/s. Most knowledgeable readers (those that require the audit/opinion) will understand and see the context. What is important to them/readers (in my opinion) is that you are presenting fairly the financials. The risk (going concern) is already baked into their evaluation.

Paul Shapiro Startup CFO Consultant • September 8, 2016

Thanks Emerson, you echo my thoughts, I was just curious if there might be different language that could be negotiated

Barrett Peterson Senior Manager, Actg Stnds & Analysis • September 8, 2016

The language, and the description of the reason for it is standard, and you are unlikely to have it modified. You probably do not want the auditor to be that "flexible", as it might signal a potential other audit weaknesses.

Want to join the conversation? Submit an answer or ask a question by emailing us at [email protected]

Submit an answer

Answers

Reach our audience

Related Publications