Is the box jenkins another method to simulate cash flows forecast? is it like the monte carlo method? what is the difference between this two?
What does the Box Jenkins method do for cash flow forecasting?
Answers
Generally speaking, there are two broad approaches to forecasting anything: time series and correlative methods. Consider a forecast for cash receipts. If I believe that I have some data or “leading indicator” that suggests what cash receipts might be in the future then I might employ a correlative approach. This leading indicator might be, say, Accounts Receivable. If I believe that the level of accounts receivable at the beginning of the month has some predictive power over the amount of cash I receive in the month then I might regress historical Accounts Receivable on historical cash receipts (regression being a correlative approach) to obtain a forecasting model. Of course, this is a much simplified example.
Of course, I may not have a leading indicator of future cash receipts. If not, then I may be forced to use a pure time-series technique that builds a forecast using only past values of cash receipts itself (and no other data). The assumption is that future cash receipts are somehow related to past values. In short, time-series methods attempt to find trends, seasonality or cyclicality in historical data and extrapolate those patterns into the future.
Box-Jenkins (a.k.a ARIMA, ARMA, autoregressive models, etc.) is the classic time-series approach to forecasting. A Box-Jenkins model may have autoregressive (AR) parameters which relate future cash flows to past cash flows and moving average (MA) parameters which relate future cash flow to past forecasting errors. It is an extremely powerful method that I frequently use when little historical data is available or, as previously stated, I can’t find a leading indicator to correlate with future cash flows. Note that the exponential smoothing forecasting model taught in the CTP curriculum is a simplified version of the Box-Jenkins setup. However, while exponential smoothing is easy to do in an
Hybrid approaches also exist (often termed ARMAX) that combine the time series benefits of Box Jenkins with the correlative benefits of regression analysis. Googling ARMAX will give you all the background you could desire.
Thank you very much, now I can see it more clearly. One more question though...
The Monte Carlo method belongs to the correlative method category?
Lets say I have historical data of the sales of a specific product, I need to somehow predict the future cash receipts from the sales of that product, witch method would be more appropriate considering that there is no budget for specialize software?
Also, would you consider an artificial neural network for the prediction or forecasting in the financial/economy world as a perhaps, better technique?
Thanks in advance, really appreciate it.
Here's a collection of free spreadsheets on Proformative that make this even clearer:
Enjoy!
Best... Sarah